NATO Forces Part 2: Fighting the Forces of Evil

President Trump goes to Europe this week. Its leaders are bracing for the impact.

Contents:

  • Access Check
  • NATO members
  • NATO nations
  • NATO and its members countries
  • 2011 NATO attack in Pakistan
  • Navigation menu
  • NATO enlargement and Russia: myths and realities

    • Analysis Interpretation of the news based on evidence, including data, as well as anticipating how events might unfold based on past events. Think that was Donald Trump?

    • International Security Assistance Force - Wikipedia.
    • The Best Horse Race Betting Systems Compendium.?
    • Ideas of Quantum Chemistry.
    • Osos y reyes (Spanish Edition).

    It was President John F. The United States has long chided Europe for not doing its part. After all, NATO allies agreed at their summit in Wales four years ago to aim to hit the 2 percent target within a decade — and German Chancellor Angela Merkel already has indicated that German defense spending would get to only 1. As the president heads off to another NATO summit, there are at least three reasons this time feels so different, and why those who value the transatlantic partnership are justifiably worried.

    Past presidents and other top officials often complained about the lack of burden sharing. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates fired off a blistering attack on allied spending in his farewell remarks in , for instance. Trump seems not to share this belief. Family members of Major Mujahid Mirani and Captain Usman Ali said the soldiers "sacrificed their lives" for the country and that they were proud of those sacrifices. On 28 November , referring to Pak-US military, intelligence, political and diplomatic co-operation, the Pakistani Prime Minister announced that there would be no more business with the US and the relations between the two countries would never be the same again.

    Access Check

    He said that NATO's regret over the attack was not enough and such incidents had happened in the past, killing 72 soldiers and injuring more than troops in three years. Commenting on drone attacks, a senior Pakistani official said that predator drones "will never be allowed back, at Shamsi or anywhere else" although he hinted that American military trainers may be allowed back into the country to train Pakistani security forces.

    As of January , foreign affairs minister Hina Rabbani Khar said Pakistan's ties with the United States were "still on hold" over the NATO air-attack and that until the re-evaluation was not complete, Washington could not ask Islamabad to pursue militant groups or assist in the Afghan peace process. In May , Bilawal Bhutto Zardari , son of President Zardari and chairman of the Pakistan Peoples Party , toughened his stance when he called on President Obama to "show some courage" and "apologise to Pakistan" over the raid.

    He called US drone operations a "constant irritant" to Pakistani public opinion and questioned whether the United States "actually considered Pakistan a military ally", citing other controversial events such as the Abbottabad operation and the Raymond Davis incident. He also remarked that while he understood Obama was facing a re-election, "the future of the NATO mission in Afghanistan should be more important than poll numbers".

    NATO members

    But what happens when it is attacked by a mixture of special forces, information campaigns and backdoor proxies? Retrieved 3 December Gen Mauro del Vecchio , EI. We are committed to working closely with Pakistan and Afghanistan to prevent this from ever happening again. After the Afghan parliamentary election , the Canadian base Camp Julien in Kabul closed, and the remaining Canadian assets were moved to Kandahar as part of Operation Enduring Freedom in preparation for a significant deployment in January, Retrieved 10 January

    A PML N politician remarked that the government's incompetence had allowed the attack to be carried out. I do not issue comments, I believe in taking action.

    NATO in Afghanistan - ISAF fighting insurgents in Kabul (2/2)

    The NATO attack received considerable criticism and caused widespread outrage among the country's civil society [] and media, with some perceiving it as an intentional act of war [] that may have been pre-planned. They died fighting terrorism". The White House released a statement in which it said that senior American officials had expressed their condolences to Pakistan and that the officials expressed "our desire to work together to determine what took place, and our commitment to the U. However, Dempsey did not apologise, [] saying he did not know enough about the incident and an inquiry was still being conducted.

    Allen , presented condolences to the family members and loved ones of the dead soldiers and ordered a "thorough investigation" into the matter. At the same time, US senators such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham said the United States needed to "fully review" its ties with Pakistan and consider enforcing cuts or new restrictions to military and economic aid, in response to attacks on American soldiers in Afghanistan which the United States accuses of having links to Pakistani intelligence agencies.

    NATO nations

    The US embassy in Islamabad released a video statement on YouTube featuring Ambassador Cameron Munter standing in front of the American and Pakistani flags, in which he expressed his regrets for the attack. Giving his condolences, Munter said the United States took the attack "very seriously" and pledged "a full, in-depth investigation. John Rees , a British socialist [] [] [] and anti-war political activist, called the NATO attack an "extremely dangerous incursion" and argued that the US and its allies were creating instability in the nuclear-armed country. Ahmed Qureshi, an Islamabad-based analyst, said during the same interview with state-run Russia Today that the prevailing public outrage may force the government and the army to take some decisive measures against the United States.

    Australian analyst Brian Cloughley said the attack would have severe consequences: According to Coughley, the USAF had full knowledge of the locations of Pakistani border posts, and thus there was no excuse for this incident. It has no answer to a resolute nation in its will to put up against an enemy and Pakistan is going to give a " Persian response " this time if the intention was to intimidate its army.

    According to Bhadrakumar, Pakistan's calculated response following the attack stops short of directly terminating its participation in the war although in essence, this event may push Pakistan's army "within inches of doing that" in the long-term scenario. A report published in the newspaper Pakistan Observer claimed that some military and defence observers at Islamabad believed NATO was playing a double game and was in league with the Tehrik-i-Taliban ; according to the report, there was a theory being circulated which suggested that the attack carried out by NATO came just when some Tehrik-i-Taliban TTP militants from Afghanistan who had entered the region had been completely encircled by Pakistani forces and were about to be eliminated "within the next few hours".

    These check posts were there to check them and prevent from crossing the border into Pakistan. Pakistani monitors and experts on Afghanistan believed that at least two Afghan military officials deployed on the border, Brigadier General Aminullah Amarkhel and Colonel Numan Hatifi of the st Silab Corps , have anti-Pakistan sentiments and links to anti-Pakistani elements.

    Writing for the Pakistani newspaper Express Tribune , Indian blogger Sanjay Kumar said the attack had elicited various reactions in India , with some vocal sections who saw Islamabad in "the prism of prejudice and paranoia" expressing glee and delight at the discomfort and supposed humiliation of their arch-rival western neighbour.

    Kumar opinionated that "such sick thought has many takers in this healthy democracy which prides itself as the voice of the third world countries". Recipients of the Tamgha-e-Basalat:.

    NATO and its members countries

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. War in Afghanistan —present. Timeline Battles and operations. War in North-West Pakistan. NATO supply lines to Afghanistan.

    • Die Moselreise: Roman eines Kindes (German Edition).
    • NATO enlargement and Russia: myths and realities?
    • Song of the North Country: A Midwest Framework to the Songs of Bob Dylan.
    • NATO attack in Pakistan - Wikipedia.
    • NATO | Armed Assault Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia.
    • .

    International Conference on Afghanistan, Bonn I would like the American public to consider what their reaction would have been if American troops had been killed in such an attack on their border with Mexico. I know that the government will not do anything except issue some silly comments against brutality even after this attack. I would like to extend my most sincere condolences to the people and government of Pakistan, and especially to Pakistan's men and women in uniform, for the tragic incident that took place on November 26 in Mohmand Agency.

    My thoughts and prayers are with the families of the men who died. Hamey bohat afsos hay we are deeply saddened.

    2011 NATO attack in Pakistan

    Associated Press of Pakistan. Retrieved 28 November Archived from the original on 25 April Retrieved 29 November Retrieved 20 November Archived from the original on 29 November Archived from the original on 26 April Retrieved 27 November Archived from the original on 23 December The International News, Karachi. Retrieved 3 December Retrieved 4 July Retrieved 6 February Archived from the original on 27 November Retrieved 30 November Retrieved 22 December Says ", Wall Street Journal , 2 December Archived from the original on 10 January Retrieved 16 February Govt response leaves room for fence-mending".

    That account of the mission is disputed by Pakistani authorities, who say the U. Islamabad rejects NATO joint probe".

    The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 28 November Retrieved 26 November NATO attack kills 26 Pakistani soldiers". Costs soar for new war supply routes". Retrieved 24 February Retrieved 30 March The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 22 April The New York Times. Retrieved 28 April Archived from the original on 14 October Retrieved 2 October Retrieved 7 August Archived from the original on 28 June The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 4 October Archived from the original on 4 June Archived from the original on 16 March Archived from the original on 28 January Retrieved 9 September Retrieved 18 January Archived from the original on 28 December Archived from the original on 23 July Archived from the original on 11 June Archived from the original on 28 October Retrieved 9 August Retrieved 10 August Retrieved 11 February Iceland Ministry for Foreign Affairs.

    Retrieved 2 April Will other European troops now leave Afghanistan? Retrieved 22 February Retrieved 1 August New capacity Archived 16 July at the Wayback Machine. Fallen soldier comes home Archived 18 October at the Wayback Machine.

    Navigation menu

    The NATO attack in Pakistan was a border skirmish that occurred when US- led NATO Part of the War in Afghanistan, the War in North-West Pakistan and the . On 26 November , US-led NATO forces opened fire on two Pakistani . (near Chaman), to supply US and international forces fighting in Afghanistan. The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) was a NATO-led security mission in . In May, , ISAF Stage 2 took place, doubling the size of the territory for . Analysts reported that he planned to place a heavier emphasis on fighting However, the Colombians were not listed as part of the force as of June ,

    Soldier's body arrives home Archived 13 March at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 15 December Ministry of Defense Slovenia. Archived from the original on 14 July Retrieved 26 January Archived from the original on 8 March Retrieved 16 September Archived from the original on 21 January Retrieved 31 July Retrieved 8 June Retrieved 13 June Retrieved 16 June Archived from the original on 7 November Australian Operation in Afghanistan.

    Australian Department of Defence.

    NATO enlargement and Russia: myths and realities

    Archived from the original on 6 October Retrieved 22 August Jordanian Military Helps Its Neighbors". Archived from the original on 30 November Archived from the original on 14 February Ministry of Defence, Singapore. Archived from the original on 31 January United Nations Security Council. Retrieved 9 February War in Afghanistan —present. Afghan forces Civilian Lists —06 Coalition U. Mano Gai airstrike Pakistani border attack Bin Laden raid Sarposa Prison tunneling escape Helmand Province incident Logar province bombing Afghanistan Ashura bombings Nimruz province bombing Zabul province bombing Chinook shootdown in Afghanistan.

    June Kabul bombings Afghan presidential palace attack attack on U. Afghan War documents leak International public opinion Opposition Protests. War in Afghanistan Iraq War Symbolism of terrorism.