Contents:
SOL 13 a - d Renaissance.
Notes for Spring Quiz 10 Day 1 Remember to make your own notes when you take this copy. Ch 13 Lesson 2 2. The Renaissance Why did it begin?.
One Cause of Renaissance: The Crusades greatly affected Europe. They resulted in an increased demand for Middle Eastern products and encouraged credit and banking. What was the Renaissance? What was the Renaissance, and where did it begin? World History The Renaissance Mr. The Renaissance l The Renaissance was a change in the social, economic, political, and cultural life of Europe.
Renaissance Rebirth of classical learning and culture An explosion of creativity in art, writing, and philosophy that lasted approximately from —.
My presentations Profile Feedback Log out. Auth with social network: Registration Forgot your password? When The Renaissance began in and ended around Dante wrote in Shakespeare wrote in The world wants for you what you want for yourself, and indeed more and more of the world has been on that delivery run for a quarter of a century now.
Twenty five years ago the Soviet Union collapsed, bringing on what some observers announced as The End of History. The wisdom that emerged was that only liberal democracy and free-market economics remained viable as ways successfully to organize society. What could be fairer, more open, and more transparent than a political system that declared all people equal in the process of selecting a leader — one person, one vote?
Liberal democracy and free-market economics are both structures that appeal to technologists and designers. In theory they have an apparent emergent intelligence that will seem magical to some: You install rules in the system; you turn on the system; you stand back, and you watch it execute to the best outcome possible for the system.
If a disturbance perturbs the system, the rules in place allow innovation, flexibility, and adaption, and the system self-stabilizes to a new best outcome. The US, the UK, and other economies on both sides of the Atlantic to varying degree practice these principles. Indeed, many observers consider that TransAtlantic Axis to be where such principles are held safe, to be passed on to others. Thus, even though membership in the club of successful economies would be open to all, it was there, the TransAtlantic Axis, from which success would unfurl.
And, indeed, that happened big-time: First, the Global Financial Crisis struck: Free-market economic orthodoxy transformed into a witch-hunt for those who dared still to suggest that market competition might produce anything other than banks too big to fail and therefore just too big or grotesquely unfair distributions of well-being across citizens.
All the good things that free-market economics brings with it — the rich variety of consumer goods, competition that lowers prices, innovation that improves the lives of people — seem to have been forgotten or are in danger of being unjustly dismissed. But then, for the purposes of this narrative, something even worse happened:.
Top 10 contributions to world growth: GDP evaluated at market exchange rates Source: Over the course of the Global Financial Crisis many observers had remarked how in their view China grew only because the West imported and therefore when the West underwent austerity the effect on China would be devastating. German exports to the rest of the world Source: The Great Shift East, None of this was supposed to happen.
From the perspective of year , current projections of Asian supremacy extrapolated from recent trends may well look almost as silly as s-vintage forecasts of Soviet industrial supremacy did from the perspective of the Brezhnev years. Yes, by those economic trends were indeed found to have given inaccurate extrapolation, not from their having been too optimistic, but instead the opposite. They have been too modest.
The crux of the author's premise is the rise of Japan as the defining architect of Asia in the last century, and within its ambit, the concurrent rise. Asia Reborn unveils the story of Asia's resurgence over the past century, cutting economic growth in ways that no European colony was ever equipped to do;.
China and the rest of East Asia of course rely on markets, after a fashion. What they did not do was buy whole-heartedly into the notion that you get economic prosperity only through ballot-box driven electoral democracy. Like many people in the West—and not just conservatives—he finds it uncomfortable that China could grow so quickly and become so powerful despite its authoritarian one-party political system.
Why should it remain? How did Renaissance thinking differ from the Medieval thinking? Every government, every ruler must be daily insecure. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. That leader has not only status and wealth beyond those of all others, it wields unrivalled political influence and military superiority beyond imagination.
That challenges his deeply held ideas about the ascendency of democratic principles, which had seemed so decisively validated by the collapse of communism elsewhere in the world. Have both planks of the end of history just fallen away? How have Chinese and other Asian systems been able to innovate and to adapt when others, those arguably the more likely to succeed, instead failed to be as robust? As Eric Li reminds us, China is a country that has taken on a dramatic range of innovation: Moreover, history from here on out might decide to lurch once again in an unexpected direction.
Either way, however, I would shy away from concluding that one system or another is necessarily better than the other. My own hunch is there are multiple pathways to prosperity and success: Trying to say once and for all that one system is best or even the least bad is almost surely foolish.
No system in history has yet been shown to be indefinitely sustainable. Where this discussion gets somewhere more concrete is instead the following. Democracy has, ultimately, meaning far more noble and important than simply, say, access to the ballot box.