Contents:
New citations to this author. New articles related to this author's research.
My profile My library Metrics Alerts. Get my own profile Cited by View all All Since Citations h-index 35 21 iindex 96 Martin Kollingbaum University of Aberdeen Verified email at abdn.
Chris Burnett University of Aberdeen Verified email at abdn. Federico Cerutti Cardiff University Verified email at cardiff. Luke Teacy University of Southamton Verified email at ecs.
Professor of Computer Science, University of Southampton. Articles Cited by Co-authors.
Argumentation Library. Free Preview New Frontiers in Argument and Computation Computational Models, Argumentation Theories and Legal Practice. Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argumentation and Computation ( Argumentation library, edited by. Frans H. van Eemeren et al., ''A Roadmap of Research in Argument and Computation,'' by Reed and Norman, motivates the.
Applied Artificial Intelligence 14 2 , , International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 5 02n03 , , In the proposed framework, information is given in the form of a stratified set of beliefs. The bipolar nature of preferences is emphasized by making an explicit distinction between prioritized goals to be pursued, and prioritized rejections that are stumbling blocks to be avoided.
A typology that identifies four types of argument is proposed. Indeed, each decision is supported by arguments emphasizing its positive consequences in terms of goals certainly satisfied and rejections certainly avoided.
A decision can also be attacked by arguments emphasizing its negative consequences in terms of certainly missed goals, or rejections certainly led to by that decision. Finally, this paper articulates the optimistic and pessimistic decision criteria defined in qualitative decision making under uncertainty, in terms of an argumentation process.
Similarly, different decision principles identified in multiple criteria decision making are restated in our argumentation-based framework. The present paper unifies and develops the content of several conference papers [L. Prade, An argumentation-based approach to multiple criteria decision, in: Prade, A bipolar argumentation-based decision framework, in: Prade, Comparing decisions in an argumentation-based setting, in: Prade, Explaining qualitative decision under uncertainty by argumentation, in: We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads.
By continuing you agree to the use of cookies.