Contents:
Such a law has existed in the UK since January That law, the Immigration Hotel Records Order, requires hotels to record the full name and nationality of every guest over For international guests, hotels must record the number and place of issue of their passports or any document confirming their identity and nationality, and their next destination in the country. The details must be kept on record for at least 12 months and 'at all times be open to inspection by any constable or by any person authorised by the Secretary of State.
The Foreign Office urges Britons to leave their passports in a safe and secure place when they travel abroad. Am I putting myself at risk? Identity theft is a big concern in this digital age, as it can result in financial losses and difficulty obtaining credit cards or a mortgage after the damage is done. If the information falls into the wrong hands, all it takes is a person's basic information to create a fraudulent identity to open bank accounts or event apply for benefits.
When they hand over a passport upon check in, guests are putting their trust in staff and the hotels they work for. Passports should always be stored in a safe and secure place such as a safe, and lost or stolen travel documents should be reported missing immediately to reduce the risk of identity theft. If a passport is stored in a hotel safe, travellers should carry a photocopy of the page with their personal details in case they require police assistance or need to show identification. Do I have to hand it over? In countries where it is required by law, guests may be turned away from a hotel if they refuse to provide their passport details.
But there's no need for them to leave their passport at the front desk after their details have been taken. Bob Atkinson, travel expert at TravelSupermarket, added: I ask them to record the details I need or to take a photocopy. I also travel with two photocopies of my passport.
In recent years offering a copy has never been refused, ensuring my passport stays safe.
Protect its security wherever you can. Losing a passport can be a headache and major worry for travellers when they head abroad, and risks exist in any country they visit. In its travel advice, the Foreign Offices urges Britons to leave their passports and other valuables in a safe place when they head abroad.
They should also carry a photocopy of the details page with them at all times in case they require police assistance or need to prove their identity when they aren't carrying their passport. This will also help in a situation where a passport needs to be replaced urgently. A photocopy should also be kept at home.
Bob Atkinson, travel expert at TravelSupermarket, said: The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline. Storm Helene smashes Scotland and north of England with 80mph gusts Is it safe to hand over your passport to a hotel when you check in? Saudi visas are in the gift of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. But so does the UK form, which, at 12 pages, is a real potboiler.
Its principal fascination is with how much money you have — income, stocks, shares — and how you spend it, but it also wants to know if you glorify or justify terrorism, if you are generally of good moral character, and whether you have any spent or unspent convictions including traffic offences. Finally, the Big Daddy, the peak of the moral high ground that is the US visa form.
And, yes, the question about membership of the Communist Party is still there.
Indeed, the idea that any of us is treated as a trustworthy witness to ourself in this age of surveillance seems weirdly anachronistic. But the tick-box confessional is less mystifying than it seems. This makes the visa a more powerful instrument of exclusion than the passport, which, in theory at least, offers the holder some protection. You trawl out your spent driving convictions, you enclose your chest X-ray and all the other folderols, and then you sign your confession. This one jubilant opportunity excepted, to cross a border legally is now a long-drawn-out act of obedience, a hushed processional from consular office to immigration desk.
At the airport, we advance, with the miniature steps of geisha girls, towards the apparatus that sees, sees into, scans and filters us. We remove our jacket, shoes, belt, and hold aloft our cosmetic secrets in a see-through plastic bag. This behaviour is so removed from the normal circumstances of our lives bar a medical examination that it can only be viewed as an act of submission, and indeed border crossing points — especially at airports — are carefully designed to induce this disciplinary state, shaping traveller flows to aggregate and separate passengers so that they have no option but to toe the line.
We submit because we believe it makes us safe, that a picture of our genitals is a fair trade for a safe flight. Booth himself designed and built an arsenal of fully functioning weapons from such retail items, including a fragmentary grenade that he made out of a coffee tumbler in less than eight minutes.
Apparently, the spikes from the crown of an eight-inch Statue of Liberty make ideal shrapnel. Smart borders are a bull market for these professionals of unease, who were the first to see, beyond the smoking rubble of the World Trade Center, a new frontier opening up.
Every cracker-barrel sage and soapbox booster turned up for the party.
One of them was Paul Ekman. When he began his research in the s, he told himself: It [is] a gold mine of information that everyone [has] ignored. Thus, the verified self becomes a perpetual confession in which your body and mind are testifying for you without you even realising it.
The programme has been rolled out in every major US airport, and according to a document leaked in March last year, it works on a points system: Whistling as you approach the screening process, add another point. A cold stare, arrogance, rigid posture all get two points. Also on the checklist: If your score climbs to six or higher out of a possible 92 , the SPOT-trained Behavioural Detection Officer will pull you out of the security line for closer inspection. Giving testimony to a congressional hearing in , Ekman claimed that border officials trained in his methods were up to fifty times more effective than their untrained colleagues at spotting high-risk passengers.
The review is still underway. One more thing about Ekman. I could teach him how not to do that in two to three hours.
The SPOT programme may yet be dropped, but the theory behind it will not. It reminds me of L. Here we are in the brightly lit arrivals hall the better to see you with, my dear , the in-between space of two worlds, the sterile testing zone. We believe we are answering truthfully, but what do we know? The self has its own internal borders and secret corridors, full of dark things we have yet to acknowledge as our own.
And anyway, who are you to ask? I was successful the judge was a preppy in a polo shirt who admired my British accent , but for years after, on every visit to the States, the red stamp marked me out as a heretic.
Now, with a clean passport, I have been rectified, as Proudhon would put it. I behave like a docile, obedient subject. I suppose the emoticon culture gets what it deserves: Total knowability is the objective, and, its high priests say, we have the technology to achieve it.
This is not a conspiracy and if it were, it would involve Facebook and Google, as much as, if not more than, the state: Who knows, perhaps it can be reached. Sometimes a destination exists simply because enough people believe it does.
Take, for example, the European Agency for the Management of Operational Co-operation at the External Borders, known as Frontex, and its vast surveillance system, Eurosur. And not just as it is today, but as it will be tomorrow, because the key mission of the system of systems is predicting the future. It works like this: This is what hypervisibility failed to see. No worries, Frontex has just been awarded a 54 per cent budget increase by the European Commission, which should pay for some tinkering with the software.
Not the Thirty Years War, or the Hundred Years War, but the for ever and everywhere war — war itself as a kind of super-world. When I look at images of the militarised European border at, say, Melilla or Ceuta — places I hope never to find myself in — I see the technologies of a medieval siege repurposed for the Technicum. This medieval modernism is born of a fatal resolve to keep the outsider out, to separate the verified from the unverified.
Every Maginot Line, sooner or later, is an Imaginot Line. On 8 July , the newly elected Pope Francis, on his first official trip outside Rome, arrived by boat at the island of Lampedusa to commemorate the thousands of migrants who have died crossing from North Africa.
After casting a wreath into the water, he celebrated mass on the sports field that doubles as a migrant reception centre. He delivered his homily from an altar constructed out of an old fishing boat. Who is responsible for this blood? In Spanish literature we have a comedy of Lope de Vega which tells how the people of the town of Fuente Ovejuna kill their governor because he is a tyrant. They do it in such a way that no one knows who the actual killer is. Today too, the question has to be asked: Not the anonymous clump of one million migrants, but us, verified down to our eyeballs, yet unseeing and unseeable behind the high wall we have built to protect ourselves from the disordered, unauthorised, unregistered others beyond.
If so, then it places us, as well as those we exclude, in jeopardy. It brings us no nearer to God, or the super-world or whatever you want to call it, because, as Eliot warned, it mistakes information for knowledge, and knowledge for wisdom. Thus, the migrant identity becomes a burden to be unloaded. Migrants often make the journey without identity documents, and I mentioned one reason for this, namely that the attempt to obtain them in their country of origin can be very dangerous.
Many destroy them deliberately because they fear, not without reason, that our system of verification will be a mechanism for sending them back. These are the weapons of the weak. Whether they had lost their identity papers, or destroyed them, when facing death the people on board wanted to be known. Everyone must be counted, but only if they count. The woman who drowned while giving birth was not a biometric subject, she was a biodegradable one. But I do want her to be known by more than just the number she was given after being hauled out of the water — and for her baby — because otherwise the story of migrants remains infinitely reproducible to the point of abstraction.
Her name, this man said, was Yohanna. There are hundreds of psychophysiological and behavioural cues e. All in good order. But as feminist philosophers of science have pointed out, these dynamics have been projected onto the sperm and the egg. Log In Register for Online Access.