Contents:
I'm betting Norway will drop another Nobel prize, mostly bc they've already shown us they have a wicked sense of humor in such regards. Technically that makes him a hypocrite of the worse malicious kind. But really if you listened to his speeches of the time, he made it clear his contempt in signing any such thing. But it's what the public and masses demanded.
The issue really isn't hypocrisy. Bc we're all hypocrites. It's if what our leaders are doing is with our best intentions in mind.
THAT is more of how politics should be approached in my insanely intellectual opinion. Don't get your ideals from ONE news source read them all before you start casting stones. But remember when your casting the "hypocrite" stone at someone I like the analogy, if only for it's lure witty and crudeness of Bentham's allusion to gas.
No one likes gas emitting from another person I apologize to that significant other and my family. You may have been victimized.
What kind of hypocrite should voters choose as their next leader? The question Political Hypocrisy: The Mask of Power, from Hobbes to Orwell and Beyond. Political Hypocrisy: The Mask of Power, from Hobbes to Orwell and Beyond [ David Runciman] on bahana-line.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. What kind.
Overall, this is an extremely enlightening book and amazingly well-referenced. But Runciman has some poetic flare as well that makes the medicine go down a bit smoother. A quote I like to surmise it all with: Mar 20, Rebecca Johnson rated it really liked it.
A fantastic, broad-sweeping, intellectual account of the problem of hypocrisy in political life, and how it has been discussed in the history of political thought. Rob Morse rated it liked it Mar 03, Michael Macdonald rated it really liked it Jun 07, Nur Rizky rated it liked it Jun 22, Ifigeneia K rated it liked it Jun 07, Frank rated it it was ok Feb 18, Robert rated it it was ok Jun 01, Victoria Adams rated it liked it Jun 25, Tony rated it liked it Mar 31, The Orwell Prize rated it it was amazing Aug 15, Jelena Cupac rated it really liked it Aug 08, Gabit rated it really liked it Sep 24, Raymond rated it it was ok Jun 01, Diogo Noivo rated it really liked it Jan 02, Markos rated it liked it Jul 10, Aaron rated it liked it Mar 03, Uber Dove rated it really liked it Sep 28, Pinto Buana rated it really liked it May 24, Jesse rated it it was amazing Jan 02, Jouke rated it it was ok May 20, Samantha marked it as to-read Aug 08, Tamra added it Mar 26, Hakija marked it as to-read Jan 31, Snail in Danger Sid Nicolaides marked it as to-read Nov 30, Nazeer marked it as to-read Apr 11, Jeremy added it May 21, Richard Ashcroft added it Jul 22, To say he is a fan of hypocrisy is an understatement.
He loves it, studies it, defines and cross-references it, deploring those who fail to see its virtues in binding together the social contract. Where would we be without it? Already a subscriber or registered access user?
We have noticed that there is an issue with your subscription billing details. Please update your billing details here. Please update your billing information. The subscription details associated with this account need to be updated.
Please update your billing details here to continue enjoying your subscription. The question seems utterly cynical. But, as David Runciman suggests, it is actually much more cynical to pretend that politics can ever be completely sincere. The most dangerous form of political hypocrisy is to claim to have a politics without hypocrisy.
Political Hypocrisy is a timely, and timeless, book on the problems of sincerity and truth in politics, and how we can deal with them without slipping into hypocrisy ourselves. Runciman tackles the problems through lessons drawn from some of the great truth-tellers in modern political thought--Hobbes, Mandeville, Jefferson, Bentham, Sidgwick, and Orwell--and applies his ideas to different kinds of hypocritical politicians from Oliver Cromwell to Hillary Clinton. Runciman argues that we should accept hypocrisy as a fact of politics, but without resigning ourselves to it, let alone cynically embracing it.
We should stop trying to eliminate every form of hypocrisy, and we should stop vainly searching for ideally authentic politicians.